tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8134468339313902988.post6010305614771976688..comments2023-10-29T08:48:05.831-04:00Comments on Bulldogs Blog: Saturday Links (1/17)Seth Emersonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06528604970395659237noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8134468339313902988.post-14571340353410887792009-01-17T14:24:00.000-05:002009-01-17T14:24:00.000-05:00BTW, I did read the article, of course. You seem t...BTW, I did read the article, of course. You seem to think that Seiler has the ability to decide for everyone else what an English bulldog is.<BR/><BR/>Either way, it's too bad the Seilers are apparently more concerned about details of the breed's appearance than whether it is healthy and sustainable.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8134468339313902988.post-79234839976835895212009-01-17T14:19:00.000-05:002009-01-17T14:19:00.000-05:00Anon 1:52, "English Bulldogs" and all other dog br...Anon 1:52, "English Bulldogs" and all other dog breeds are arbitrary designations; this breed was first recognized, in England, in about 1568. Over time the standard for the breed has evolved--changed by the English (hence, ENGLISH, not AMERICAN, bulldog). Even Ugas have changed--look at pics of Uga 1 or Uga 2. <BR/><BR/>So if those who have the status of "authority" (in this case, the English), Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8134468339313902988.post-70456998001130365762009-01-17T14:17:00.000-05:002009-01-17T14:17:00.000-05:00"Five days counting until the new season of 'Lost...."Five days counting until the new season of 'Lost.'"<BR/><BR/>YES!<BR/><BR/>"We have to go back!!!"Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8134468339313902988.post-69897183187627392692009-01-17T12:21:00.000-05:002009-01-17T12:21:00.000-05:00Personally, I've always liked the look of the earl...Personally, I've always liked the look of the early Ugas better than the more recent ones. I would welcome a shift to a sleeker, more athletic-looking dog.BenGhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04261680960903561980noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8134468339313902988.post-51731541993130152292009-01-17T10:39:00.000-05:002009-01-17T10:39:00.000-05:00Anon 10:03, you idiot, they are ENGLISH bulldogs! ...Anon 10:03, you idiot, they are ENGLISH bulldogs! You better care what the British think!<BR/><BR/>You act as though the British have specifically contacted UGA or the Seilers and told them to stop breeding dogs. Personally, I don't see how anyone can claim they care about dogs--any dog--and not be interested in a breed's health and genetic changes over time.<BR/><BR/>For the sake of the dogs, Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8134468339313902988.post-70339185177320866272009-01-17T10:03:00.000-05:002009-01-17T10:03:00.000-05:00Who gives a damn what the British think of the Bul...Who gives a damn what the British think of the Bulldog? Sonny Seiller doesn't and neither do Georgia fans. Besides Uga is AKC registered- that's American not British.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8134468339313902988.post-31355468316673620942009-01-17T09:08:00.000-05:002009-01-17T09:08:00.000-05:00This was racy enough for a PG-13 rating.The Glazer...This was racy enough for a PG-13 rating.<BR/><BR/>The Glazers once again proved they are the NFLs nuttiest family owners.<BR/><BR/>It seems that draft expert uses ?'s when they're not needed and doesn't use them when they are. That and he somehow has Thomas Davis confused with a RB out of Virginia.<BR/><BR/>And the Kennedy's...well...I just don't know that I would have gone there.Berniehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05115364033772697407noreply@blogger.com